House of Commons
8 May 2026
May contain errors — check source documents for definitive information.
The Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026 strengthens protections for children in education. It introduces allergy-safety duties for schools, tightens safeguarding and data-sharing rules, updates support for looked-after and adopted children, and expands corporate parenting duties, while overhauling online safety rules for under-18s and setting school-related governance and cost rules. After lengthy negotiations between Parliament’s houses, it received Royal Assent and became law in 2026.
The bill travelled through both Houses with extensive cross-party negotiation, especially around online safety and school governance. It received Royal Assent on 8 May 2026 and is now law, implementing a broad set of child-protection and education reforms.
In the Commons, Labour and allied groups consistently supported the bill, while the Conservative Party and several smaller parties largely opposed many of its provisions. Lords amendments prompted further cross‑house negotiation, with some amendments accepted and others defeated in divisions, reflecting a major policy debate over online safety scope, age checks, and school-cost rules before the final Act was agreed.
Generated 21 February 2026
17 Dec 2024
8 Jan 2025
8 Jan 2025
8 Jan 2025
21 Jan 2025, 23 Jan 2025, 28 Jan 2025, 30 Jan 2025, 4 Feb 2025, 6 Feb 2025, 11 Feb 2025
17 Mar 2025
17 Mar 2025, 18 Mar 2025
18 Mar 2025
19 Mar 2025
1 May 2025
20 May 2025, 22 May 2025, 9 Jun 2025, 12 Jun 2025, 17 Jun 2025, 19 Jun 2025, 23 Jun 2025, 3 Jul 2025, 2 Sept 2025, 10 Sept 2025, 16 Sept 2025, 18 Sept 2025
14 Jan 2026, 19 Jan 2026, 21 Jan 2026, 28 Jan 2026, 3 Feb 2026
9 Feb 2026
9 Mar 2026
9 Mar 2026
25 Mar 2026
15 Apr 2026
15 Apr 2026
20 Apr 2026
22 Apr 2026
Showing agreed, defeated, and withdrawn amendments.
Based on 13 recorded votes • Sorted by % Aye
Following agreement by both Houses on the text of the bill it received Royal Assent on 29 April. The bill is now an Act of Parliament (law).
An Act delivering wide-ranging reforms to children’s social care and education. It strengthens safeguarding, information sharing, and corporate parenting duties for looked-after and kinship children, and tightens oversight and penalties for providers. In schools, it introduces new rules on meals, attendance, admissions, and governance of academies/independent schools, plus online safety and data-processing protections and related UK-wide provisions.
This Lords publication is the marshalled list of motions for the Lords to consider Commons amendments to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill. It records Lords Amendments 37 and 38 proposing a VPN ban for UK children and mandatory age‑verification/social‑media wellbeing measures aligned with the Online Safety Act, which the Commons oppose and replace with amendments in lieu (38A onwards) to extend powers for ISPs to restrict or prevent child access to internet services, plus changes to age of consent rules and related safeguards, with timelines and reporting requirements. The document also details the ongoing parliamentary cross‑party dispute, including further amendments (38J and related 38V–38X, 38Z series) and the procedures for debating and finalising these provisions.
The Lords push for a new clause to promote children’s wellbeing online, including providing parental guidance on social media use and requiring strong age checks for under-16s on regulated services, with regulations enforceable under the Online Safety Act 2023. The Commons respond with amendments (38J and related) to give powers to internet providers to block or restrict children’s access, introduce age-verification and consent rules for information society services, require a progress statement and curriculum content, and set timelines. The Lords counter with amendments in lieu and the debate focuses on how to regulate online safety for children, including age thresholds, enforcement, and regulatory oversight.
The supplementary memorandum explains a new/updated power that lets the Secretary of State make regulations about how the Schools Adjudicator decides Published Admission Numbers (PANs). The regulations would require the adjudicator to consult additional parties (potentially including religious bodies) and to consider factors such as infant class sizes, the quality of education, and parental preference across the school and local area. The measure remains subject to negative parliamentary procedure, with the aim of keeping decision-making aligned with evolving accountability measures.