MP for Burton and Uttoxeter
“A centre-left Labour backbencher with strong party loyalty who has shown rare rebellion on end-of-life care legislation.”
Jacob Collier is a Labour and Co-operative MP for Burton and Uttoxeter, elected in July 2024. He sits on the Transport Committee and on several Bills committees, including the Courts (Remote Hearings) Bill, Licensing Hours Extensions Bill, and the Petitions Committee, and previously served on the Renters’ Rights Bill committee in late 2024.
Has very high party loyalty (99%) but relatively low attendance (15% of votes). He has a mixed voting record on Universal Credit, generally supports workers’ rights protections and trade union powers, and usually backs renter protections, mental health services, and VAT changes. He tends to vote against harsher prison sentencing, regulation of bus services, and transgender rights, with climate-change votes showing a mixed pattern. Notably, he voted AYE on two End of Life Bill clauses in June 2025 against the party line.
Declared financial interests include gifts, benefits and hospitality from UK sources (6 entries), miscellaneous (3 entries), and visits outside the UK (1 entry).
Generated 21 February 2026
How this MP participates in parliamentary votes. These numbers describe activity, not effectiveness.
How often this MP votes
Labour (Co-op) average: 33%
The percentage of parliamentary votes (divisions) this MP participated in. MPs may miss votes for legitimate reasons including ministerial duties, constituency work, or illness.
How often this MP votes with their party
Labour (Co-op) average: 99%
Estimated from voting record, not self-declared. This is a simplified model — real politics is more complex than a single axis.
5 positions
Transport Committee
Since Oct 2025
Courts (Remote Hearings) Bill
Since Jun 2025
Licensing Hours Extensions Bill
Since Jun 2025
Petitions Committee
Since Mar 2025
Renters’ Rights Bill
Oct 2024 - Nov 2024
Figures include only interests with declared monetary values from the Register of Members' Financial Interests. Some categories (e.g. hospitality, overseas visits) may not have monetary values recorded, so the total may not reflect all declared interests.
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 6
AYEVictims and Courts Bill
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 5
AYEVictims and Courts Bill
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 4
AYEVictims and Courts Bill
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 3
AYEVictims and Courts Bill
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 2
AYEVictims and Courts Bill
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1
AYEVictims and Courts Bill
Opposition Day Motion: Defence
NOOpposition Day Motion: Oil and Gas
NONational Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 6
AYENational Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 5
AYENational Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 3
AYENational Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 2
AYENational Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1
AYENational Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
Opposition day motion: student loans
NOOpposition day motion: fuel duty
NOThe percentage of votes where this MP voted the same way as the majority of their party. High loyalty is typical; most MPs vote with their party on most issues.
Rebel votes
Times this MP voted differently from the majority of their party. This can reflect independent judgement, but context matters — some rebel votes are on procedural matters, others on major policy.
