TrackPolitics logoTrackPolitics
HomeMy MPIssuesPromises
About
HomeMy MPIssuesPromisesCompareSpectrumBillsMPsPartiesVotes
© 2026 TrackPolitics.uk — Holding politicians accountable through data
How Parliament WorksAbout
All votes
Lords Amendment

Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1

Tuesday, 20 January 2026

View bill

What was this vote about?

This was a lords amendment on the Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill. The bill puts a 2025 UK–Mauritius agreement about the Chagos Archipelago into law and makes related changes to BIOT governance and nationality rules. It has prompted extensive Lords amendments focused on safeguards for Chagossians, sovereignty matters, environmental protections, and parliamentary oversight, which the Commons has largely resisted; the bill is now being considered in the Lords to resolve those differences.

  • •Implements the UK–Mauritius treaty on Diego Garcia and the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT), including potential changes to BIOT’s constitutional status and nationality rules for people connected with BIOT.
  • •Lords amendments seek wide safeguards: recognise Chagossian rights (including potential return and a referendum on sovereignty), require negotiations with Mauritius on resettlement and asylum, and establish robust governance and reporting (including a Joint UK–Mauritius Parliamentary Commission and an inter-parliamentary committee).
  • •Provides for cost transparency and financial accountability, including parliamentary scrutiny of treaty payments to Mauritius and mechanisms to delay or condition parts of the Act pending environmental protections and other safeguards.
  • •Introduces procedural controls on Orders made under the Act (notably Clause 6), including a push for negative resolution scrutiny, and contemplates additional safeguards such as independent reporting on environmental and legal risks before provisions take effect.

The result

Motion passed
Margin: 162
344
182
Aye (65%)No (35%)

526 of 650 eligible MPs voted (81% turnout)

How each party voted

Green Party
Voted for
3 aye0 no1 absent
Social Democratic & Labour Party
Voted for
1 aye0 no1 absent
Your Party
Voted for
1 aye0 no
Labour (Co-op)
Voted for
331 aye2 no68 absent
Independent
Split
7 aye3 no3 absent
Conservative
Voted against
0 aye98 no16 absent

Who rebelled?(5 MPs)

5 MPs voted against their party whip.

Independent(3 rebels — party voted aye)
Alex Easton(North Down)
no
Rosie Duffield(Canterbury)
no
Patrick Spencer(Central Suffolk and North Ipswich)
no
Labour (Co-op)(2 rebels — party voted aye)
Graham Stringer(Blackley and Middleton South)
no
Peter Lamb(Crawley)
no

Turnout by party

81%
Ulster Unionist Party
1/1 (100%)
Democratic Unionist Party
5/5 (100%)
Traditional Unionist Voice
1/1 (100%)
Your Party
1/1 (100%)
Restore Britain
1/1 (100%)
Liberal Democrat
63/72 (88%)
Reform UK
7/8 (88%)
Conservative
98/114 (86%)

What happens next?

The Lords amendment result is sent back to the other House for consideration.

Current stage: Consideration of Commons amendments and / or reasons