MP for Maidenhead
Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Investment and Trade)
“A party‑loyal Lib Dem MP focused on investment and trade, with a centre‑right stance and notably low voting attendance.”
Joshua Reynolds is a Liberal Democrat MP for Maidenhead, first elected in 2024. He serves as the Liberal Democrat Spokesperson for Investment and Trade and sits on the Business and Trade Committee as well as the Sub-Committee on Economic Security, Arms and Export Controls. In Parliament he has also participated in the Finance (No. 2) Bill committee in early 2026.
He has 100% party loyalty with no rebel votes and a voting attendance of 12%, below his party's average of 19%. His record shows support for Universal Credit, bus services regulation, transgender rights, renter protections and some climate measures, while he generally opposes workers’ rights protections, the powers of trade unions, and VAT changes, with a mixed pattern on mental health.
He has nine declared interests: gifts, benefits and hospitality from UK sources (three entries); miscellaneous entries (three); donations and other support for activities as an MP (one); employment and earnings (one); and ongoing paid employment (one).
Generated 21 February 2026
How this MP participates in parliamentary votes. These numbers describe activity, not effectiveness.
How often this MP votes
Liberal Democrat average: 19%
The percentage of parliamentary votes (divisions) this MP participated in. MPs may miss votes for legitimate reasons including ministerial duties, constituency work, or illness.
How often this MP votes with their party
Liberal Democrat average: 100%
Estimated from voting record, not self-declared. This is a simplified model — real politics is more complex than a single axis.
4 positions
Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Investment and Trade)
Since Oct 2025
Business and Trade Sub-Committee on Economic Security, Arms and Export Controls
Since Mar 2025
Business and Trade Committee
Since Oct 2024
Finance (No. 2) Bill
Jan 2026 - Feb 2026
Figures include only interests with declared monetary values from the Register of Members' Financial Interests. Some categories (e.g. hospitality, overseas visits) may not have monetary values recorded, so the total may not reflect all declared interests.
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 6
NOVictims and Courts Bill
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 5
NOVictims and Courts Bill
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 4
NOVictims and Courts Bill
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 3
NOVictims and Courts Bill
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 2
NOVictims and Courts Bill
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1
NOVictims and Courts Bill
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 6
NONational Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 5
NONational Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 3
NONational Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 2
NONational Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1
NONational Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
Finance (No. 2) Bill: Third Reading
NOFinance (No. 2) Bill
Finance (No. 2) Bill Report Stage: Amendment 6
AYEFinance (No. 2) Bill
Finance (No. 2) Bill Report Stage: Amendment 5
AYEFinance (No. 2) Bill
Finance (No. 2) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 11
AYEFinance (No. 2) Bill
The percentage of votes where this MP voted the same way as the majority of their party. High loyalty is typical; most MPs vote with their party on most issues.
Rebel votes
Times this MP voted differently from the majority of their party. This can reflect independent judgement, but context matters — some rebel votes are on procedural matters, others on major policy.