MP for Pendle and Clitheroe
“A Labour Co-op backbencher with a strong pro‑workers voting record, notable for unusually low parliamentary attendance and occasional rebellions against the party.”
Jonathan Hinder is the Labour (Co-op) MP for Pendle and Clitheroe, elected in July 2024. He represents his constituency in Parliament as a backbench MP and has a voting record that emphasises workers’ rights and renter protections, with a left-leaning stance.
His voting shows near‑party loyalty (98%, close to the Labour average of 99%), but attendance is very low at 14% (vs. 33% average). He sits on the left of the spectrum (29/100). He generally votes in favour of trade union powers and workers’ rights protections, and in favour of renter protections, while often opposing transgender rights and the expansion of mental health services, and taking a mixed line on climate change measures. He has a record of occasional rebellions, voting aye against the party line on five occasions in 2025 (Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill Remaining Stages: New Clause 5; Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill: Amendments 12 and 24; Crime and Policing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 106; Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill: New Clause 2).
Declared financial interests include one miscellaneous entry.
Generated 21 February 2026
How this MP participates in parliamentary votes. These numbers describe activity, not effectiveness.
How often this MP votes
Labour (Co-op) average: 33%
The percentage of parliamentary votes (divisions) this MP participated in. MPs may miss votes for legitimate reasons including ministerial duties, constituency work, or illness.
How often this MP votes with their party
Labour (Co-op) average: 99%
Estimated from voting record, not self-declared. This is a simplified model — real politics is more complex than a single axis.
Figures include only interests with declared monetary values from the Register of Members' Financial Interests. Some categories (e.g. hospitality, overseas visits) may not have monetary values recorded, so the total may not reflect all declared interests.
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill: Third Reading
AYEUniversal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill [HL]
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill Committee: New Clause 3
NOUniversal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill
Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill Committee: New Clause 3
NOIndustry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill
Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill Committee: New Clause 2
NOIndustry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill
Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill Committee: Amendment 1
NOIndustry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill
Referendums Relating to Council Tax Increases (Principles) (England) Report 2026-27
AYEDraft Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (Amendment) (Extension to Maritime Activities) Order 2026
AYEDraft Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (Amendment) Order 2026
AYEUniversal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill: Second Reading
AYEUniversal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill [HL]
Opposition Day: Youth unemployment
NOOpposition Day: British Indian Ocean Territory
NODraft Medical Devices (Fees Amendment) Regulations 2026
AYEMedical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Amendment 1
NOMedical Training (Prioritisation) Bill
Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Amendment 2
NOMedical Training (Prioritisation) Bill
Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Amendment 9
NOMedical Training (Prioritisation) Bill
The percentage of votes where this MP voted the same way as the majority of their party. High loyalty is typical; most MPs vote with their party on most issues.
Rebel votes
Times this MP voted differently from the majority of their party. This can reflect independent judgement, but context matters — some rebel votes are on procedural matters, others on major policy.
