MP for Droitwich and Evesham
Shadow Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport
“A loyal Conservative MP with a strong attendance record and a finance and international trade background, now shadowing Culture, Media and Sport.”
Nigel Huddleston is a Conservative MP for Droitwich and Evesham, first elected in 2015. He has held varied finance- and international trade-related government roles, and since July 2025 has been the Shadow Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, with the additional role of Conservative Party Co-Chair since November 2024.
Huddleston has very high party loyalty and good attendance (100% loyalty, 83% attendance). He has made a small number of rebel votes (3) and sits on the centre-right of the political spectrum (56/100).
Huddleston has declared 13 financial interests, including gifts and benefits from UK sources and from outside the UK, a shareholding, and overseas visits.
Generated 21 February 2026
How this MP participates in parliamentary votes. These numbers describe activity, not effectiveness.
How often this MP votes
Conservative average: 56%
The percentage of parliamentary votes (divisions) this MP participated in. MPs may miss votes for legitimate reasons including ministerial duties, constituency work, or illness.
How often this MP votes with their party
Conservative average: 99%
Estimated from voting record, not self-declared. This is a simplified model — real politics is more complex than a single axis.
18 positions
Shadow Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport
Since Jul 2025
Co-Chair, Conservative Party
Since Nov 2024
Shadow Financial Secretary (Treasury)
Jul 2024 - Nov 2024
Finance (No.2) Bill
May 2024 - May 2024
Finance Bill
Jan 2024 - Jan 2024
Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)
Nov 2023 - Jul 2024
Minister of State (Department for Business and Trade)
Feb 2023 - Nov 2023
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for International Trade)
Oct 2022 - Feb 2023
Figures include only interests with declared monetary values from the Register of Members' Financial Interests. Some categories (e.g. hospitality, overseas visits) may not have monetary values recorded, so the total may not reflect all declared interests.
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 6
NOVictims and Courts Bill
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 5
NOVictims and Courts Bill
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 4
NOVictims and Courts Bill
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 3
NOVictims and Courts Bill
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 2
NOVictims and Courts Bill
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1
NOVictims and Courts Bill
Opposition Day Motion: Defence
AYEOpposition Day Motion: Oil and Gas
AYENational Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 6
NONational Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 5
NONational Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 3
NONational Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 2
NONational Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1
NONational Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
Opposition day motion: student loans
AYEOpposition day motion: fuel duty
AYEThe percentage of votes where this MP voted the same way as the majority of their party. High loyalty is typical; most MPs vote with their party on most issues.
Rebel votes
Times this MP voted differently from the majority of their party. This can reflect independent judgement, but context matters — some rebel votes are on procedural matters, others on major policy.
